NATIONAL CONSULTANT: TO CONDUCT THE EVALUATION OF THE SUPPORT FOR THE STRENGHTENING OF THE PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RULES OF LAW THROUGH ENHANCED CAPACITY OF INSTITUTIONS IN THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND LEGAL AFFAIRS

Location : Harare, ZIMBABWE
Application Deadline :17-Jul-12
Type of Contract :Individual Contract
Post Level :National Consultant
Languages Required :
English  
Starting Date :
(date when the selected candidate is expected to start)
01-Aug-2012
Duration of Initial Contract :30 Days
Expected Duration of Assignment :30 Days

Background

The Ministry of Justice & Legal Affairs through the Inter Ministerial Committee on Human Rights & International Humanitarian Law (IMC) is one of the Responsible Parties in the UNDP supported project.

Period of assignment/services: 1st August 2012 to 30th August 2012

Proposal should be submitted at the following address:
Registry
UNDP
Arundel Office Park
Block 10
Norfolk Road, Mount Pleasant
Harare
Or by email to;
bidstechnical.zw@undp.org (for technical proposals)
bidsfinancial.zw@undp.org (for financial proposals)
Deadline:  No later than 17 July 2012 by 10.00 AM (Harare/Pretoria time; GMT +2 Hours)
Marked: “Proposal for the evaluation of the support for the strengthening of the promotion and protection of human rights and rules of law through enhanced capacity of institutions in the Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs

Your package should contain two envelopes:
One marked “Technical Proposal” and containing CVs as described below in Section 4 and the second envelope “Financial Proposal”.  All submissions should be made in the Annex attached herewith.
Request for clarification on TORs should be sent in writing by email to procurement.zw@undp.org no later than 12 July. 
 
Background
Support for the strengthening of the promotion and protection of Human Rights and Rule of Law through enhanced capacity of institutions in the Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs.
Zimbabwe is committed to the observance, promotion and protection of human rights for all. In this regard Zimbabwe has ratified and acceded to key international, regional and sub-regional standard on human rights. Zimbabwe has submitted initial reports for most of the ratified treaties but the challenge remains in submitting the periodic and follow up reports.
There are notable treaties to which Zimbabwe is not yet party such as the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment and its Operational Protocol; The two Optional Protocols to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights; The Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Discrimination Against Women; and the two Optional Protocols to the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
In addition, there has not been full domestication of the treaties ratified although some national laws passed in Parliament of Zimbabwe have incorporated some provisions as contained in international treaties. The Constitution of Zimbabwe contains a bill of rights which enshrines some of the civil and political rights outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
In 1993, a Cabinet Resolution of the Government established the Inter-ministerial Committee on Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (IMC). Its mandate was to assist the Government in drafting state party reports that become due to treaty monitoring bodies as well as advise the Government on ratification and domestication of other treaties.
The project commenced in January 2004 and was to end initially in December 2008 but was extended to December 2011.  The framework for operation was a signed Project Document (PD). At the end of 2008, which marked the end date indicated in the PD, the partners adopted the Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP) and Annual Work Plan as a replacement of the PD in line with the new UNDP Project Management Guidelines.
The Government of Zimbabwe through the Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs, Civil Society Organisations and other national stakeholders, with technical and financial support from UNDP, implemented the project under the National Execution (NEX) modality.

Duties and Responsibilities

Main areas of focus:
The overarching strategic objective of the project was to work with the Government of Zimbabwe (GOZ) to contribute to strengthening human rights, good governance and the rule of law through capacity building and informed policy dialogue with all stakeholders (State institutions, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) in Zimbabwe.  UN agencies and donors were cooperating partners on this project.
The project focused on five main areas:
  • Building capacity of institutions like the IMC in order to prepare and submit state party reports;
  • Technical support on ratification and domestication of instruments Zimbabwe has not ratifies;
  • Support engagement toward the establishment of a National Human Rights Institution;
  • Capacity support to justice delivery service organs;
  • Support human rights mainstreaming in UN agencies as they collaborate with the GoZ Institutional strengthening.
It is against this background that UNDP in conjunction with the Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs are seeking the services of a consultant to carry out a Terminal Evaluation of this project. Overall, the evaluation has the following four aims:
  • Assess the project design and its achievements against the intended objectives and outputs;
  • Examine whether the activities, outputs and objectives outlined in the programme document have been achieved and make recommendations on the way forward;
  • Draw lessons that will guide the design of future interventions, in particular a successor project for supporting and strengthening the human rights architecture and enhance knowledge sharing;
  • Assess the contribution of the project towards meeting UNDP’s commitment of support to the Government of Zimbabwe.
Scope of work, responsibilities and description of  proposed analytical work:
The scope of the evaluation is expected to cover UNDP, the implementing Ministry, CSOs contracted as responsible parties, and the target beneficiaries from the project.
The terminal evaluation is expected to specifically address all the following issues:
  • Conduct a desk literature review of the GoZ Support for the strengthening of the promotion and protection of Human Rights and Rule of Law through enhanced capacity of institutions in the Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs  Programme documentation, including supporting frameworks and statutory instruments;
  • Briefly review the past and present major GoZ priorities on the promotion and protection of human rights and rule of law reforms and relevance of the project objectives, outputs and outcomes, as outlined in the Government priorities/ frameworks;
  • Assess the progress towards the achievement of project outputs while highlighting the contributory factor to project success on a particular objective, or lack of it;
  • Assess the effectiveness of the project design in terms of depth and breadth vis-a-vis the beneficiaries’ needs and the capacities of local authorities, the implementing ministry and UNDP to deliver on the intended objectives;
  • Analyse the extent to which the various project components have managed to synergise project impact through linkages in purpose and coordination.In particular, assess whether the women empowerment and gender mainstreaming component was effectively taken on board, citing the strategies engaged;
  • Analyse and assess the effectiveness of the institutional arrangements for project implementation;
  • Assess the accountability, planning and M&E systems and tools and make recommendations for their improvement, if necessary;
  • Analyse the linkages between the project and other projects that are implemented in the government ministries and the synergies that have been generated towards meeting international obligations on human rights, the capacity to report to treaty bodies and the effectiveness of domestication and ratification efforts;
  • Analyse and assess the effectiveness and challenges of the funds disbursement and procurement mechanisms and make recommendations on how these could be improved;
  • Assess the contribution of the project within the context of UNDP’s commitments under the Zimbabwe United Nations Development Assistance Framework (ZUNDAF), Country Programme Document (CPD) and CPAP;
  • Make recommendations on the alignment of project focus and design to the UNDP Corporate Strategy 2012-2015, RBA Strategy and Management Review and Zimbabwe Country Office strategic focus areas Support to democratic governance and the emerging policy thrust of the new Global Political Agreement’s Inclusive Government.
Expected outputs

A comprehensive detailed evaluation report should be structured along the following lines:

  1. Executive summary
  2. Introduction
  3. The project and its development context
  4. Findings and Conclusions
    4.1.Project formulation

             4.2. Implementation

            4.3. Results

        5. Recommendations

        6. Lessons learned
        7. Annexes  - in addition to the evaluation report , other products such as presentations of findings is requested    including  annexes detailing names of persons interviewed, documents reviewed, field visits, evaluation methodology, case studies & photographs, TOR’s etc.,

In addition the following should be adhered to:
  • The length of the report should not exceed 50 pages in total;
  • The first draft of the report should be submitted within 2 weeks of completion of the mission;
  • The draft should be submitted to UNDP and it will be circulated for comments to Ministry of Justice and Legal Affairs, Project Management and other key stakeholders; and,
  • If there are discrepancies between the views and findings of the evaluation team and the aforementioned parties, these should be explained in an annex attached to the final report.

Competencies

Development Consultant with 10 years development expertise and experience in the following areas:
  • Participatory project design, management and implementation;
  • Evaluation of development programmes and projects;
  • Experience in governance, rule of law, international law and human rights;
  • Knowledge of local environment;
  • Strong communication skills (writing and oral);
  • Computer literacy.

Required Skills and Experience

Education:
  • Master’s degree in Political Science, International Relations, Law, Social Science, Business Administration, Public Administration, Public Policy or related field;
  • A PhD in a relevant field will be a distinct advantage.
Experience:
  • At least ten years work experience in the area of governance, rule of law, human rights and preferably with a focus on institutional capacity development and programme evaluation;
  • Experience of working in a multi-cultural diverse and dynamic environment;
  • Knowledge and familiarity with UN System.
Documents to be included when submitting the proposals
Interested Consultant must submit the following documents/information to demonstrate their qualifications:
  • Annex 1 - Letter stating suitability for the assignment
  • Annex 2 – Proposal Submission form for Individual Contractor
  • Annex 3 - CV and signed P.11 Form
  • Annex 4 – Price Schedule for Individual Contractor
  • Annex 5 – Minimum Requirements
Financial  Proposal
Contracts based on total contract fee - Payments shall be made to the consultant based on the agreed contract.
The financial proposal should specify the contract fee, which includes all other costs like airfare, per diems, etc. For evaluation purpose, the financial offer should provide breakdown of all costs.
Evaluation
Individual consultants will be evaluated based on the Cumulative Analysis methodology in which:
Two-Stage Procedure
Stage 1 - The evaluation committee shall evaluate the Technical Proposals on the basis of their responsiveness applying the evaluation criteria, sub-criteria, and point system specified. Each responsive Proposal will be given a technical score.  A Proposal shall be rejected at this stage if it does not respond to important aspects of the tender and particularly the Terms of Reference or if it fails to achieve the minimum technical score of 70% out of the obtainable score of 100. Offerors, who have attained minimum 70% score in the technical evaluation, will be considered for further financial evaluation. 
Stage 2 – All offers that attained 70%  and above in the technical evaluation, will have their Financial Proposals opened.  The weight given to the Financial Proposal is 30  The Price Proposal is evaluated based on the following formula:
P = 30 x Fm / F
Lowest Priced Proposal (Fm), Price of Proposal to be evaluated (F) and Financial Score (P).

The lowest evaluated Financial Proposal (Fm) will be given the maximum financial score (P) of 300 points. The financial proposal is based on the lump sum price to cover activities during the contractual period.
Proposals will be ranked according to their combined technical (T) and financial (P) scores using the weights (T = the weight given to the Technical Proposal; P = the weight given to the Financial Proposal).
 
For details on the technical proposal evaluation please go to the UNDP Zimbabwe website on the following link:
www.undp.org.zw
UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.
 

UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.