Background
- Strengthening systematic capacity–namely the enabling legal/policy environment and financial mechanisms for PA management
- Strengthening the institutional capacity for PA management, including partnership with other government agencies, local communities and the private sector, to add to the range of options currently available. These interventions are critical to improve management effectiveness in the PA system as a whole.
- Envisaged to build on the successes of Phase I by consolidating the experience and lessons learned in Phase I ensuring that PAs are systematically Mainstreamed into regional and local development, building on the lessons learned and experience gained. Funding for Phase II was not secured and therefore the project will end after Phase I.
- Park and Wildlife management Act and Regulations
- Park Management Plans
- Sustainable PA Financing Mechanism
- Strategic PA Network Plan
- Systematic Biodiversity Monitoring Mechanism
- Knowledge Management System
- Structural Reorganization
- Devolution of Decision making and Financial Management
- Individual and Park-Level Performance M&E
- Training and Incentive Mechanisms
- PA Economics and Business Planning Capacity
- Partnership Building Capacity
- HIV/AIDS Succession Planning Capacity
- Field Demonstration Site 1: Ai-Ais Hotsprings Game Park
- Field Demonstration Site 2: Bwabwata-Mudumu-Mamili Complex
- Field Demonstration Site 2: Etosha/Skeleton Coast Link
- Field Demonstration Site 4: Sperrgebiet National Park (combined with field demonstration site 1)
Duties and Responsibilities
- Sustainability
- Outcome/Achievement of objectives (the extent to which the projects immediate and development objectives were achieved).
The review team should provide ratings for three of the criteria included in the Final Evaluations:
- Implementation Approach
- Stakeholder Participation/Public Involvement
- Monitoring and Evaluation. The ratings will be based upon the UNDP/GEF six-point scale: Highly Satisfactory (HS), Satisfactory (S), Marginally Satisfactory (MS), Marginally Unsatisfactory (MU), Unsatisfactory (U) and Highly Unsatisfactory (HS).
Project Conceptualization Design:
To identify and acertain the following:
- Problem was clearly identified and the approach soundly conceived.
- The target beneficiaries and end-users of the results of the project were clearly identified.
- The objectives and outputs of the project were stated explicitly and precisely in verifiable terms with observable success indicators.
- The relationship between objectives, outputs, activities and inputs of the project were logically articulated.
- If the project started with a well-prepared work-plan and reasons, if any, for deviations.
- The indicators were SMART.
- Relevance to the development priorities of the country.
- Given the project objectives, identify appropriate institutions that have been assisted.
- The delivery of inputs specified in the project document, including selection of sub-project, institutional arrangements, interest of beneficiaries, the scheduling and actual implementation.
- The fulfillment of the success criteria as outlines in the project document.
- The responsiveness of the project management to significant changes in the environment in which the project functions (both facilitating and impeding project implementation).
- Lessons from other relevant projects if incorporated in the project implementation.
- The monitoring and backstopping of the project as expected by the Government and UNDP.
- The delivery of Government counterpart inputs in terms of personnel, premises and indigenous equipment.
- The project’s collaboration with industry associations, private sector and civil society.
- Appropriate project management arrangements.
- Adequate project resources (financial, physical and manpower) in terms of both quantity and quality.
- Use of project resources to effectively produce planned results.
- Was project cost-effective compared to similar interventions.
- Whether the technologies selected (any innovations adopted, if any) were suitable.
- The role of UNDP Country Office and its impact (positive or negative) on the functioning of the project.
- Major achievements of the project vis-à-vis its objectives, outcomes and outputs.
- Other potential areas could have provided project success? Please explain in detail in terms of impact, sustainability of results and contribution to capacity development.
- Major issues and problems affected the implementation of the project, and what factors could have resolved them.
- Given an opportunity, what actions would the evaluation team members recommend to realize actual success.
- Level of institutional networking achieved and capacity development of key partners, if done in a structured manner at different stages - from inception to implementation.
- Environmental impacts (positive and negative) and remedial actions taken, if relevant.
- Social impacts, including impact on the lives of women at each demonstration site.
- Any underlying factors, beyond control, that influenced the outcome of the project.
Competencies
- Be conversant with administrative/financial/procurement UNDP procedures.
- Experience in conducting evaluations.
- Proven ability to write technical reports.
- Possess excellent interpersonal skills and demonstrated ability to network and foster teamwork.
- Strong foundation in climate change adaptation programming.
- Substantive computer knowledge.
- Experience working in the region is desirable.
- Explaining why you are the most suitable for the work.
- Provide a brief methodology on how they will approach and conduct the work (if applicable)
Required Skills and Experience
Education:
- Masters Degree in Environmental sciences or other related field.
- Additional years of relevant work experience preferably in combination with a relevant Bachelor's Degree, may substitute for the requirement for a master's degree.
Experience:
- Minimum five (5) years experience in natural resources and environmental management fields.
- Substantive work experience with donors and preferably UNDP M&E framework and Result Based Management system, GEF projects and evaluations.