- UNDP around the world
Many of UNDP's relationships with countries and territories on the ground exceed 60 years. Find details on our successes and ongoing work.
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Burkina Faso
- Cape Verde
- Central African Republic
- Congo (Dem. Republic of)
- Congo (Republic of)
- Costa Rica
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Democratic People's Republic of Korea
- Denmark (Rep. Office)
- Dominican Republic
- E.U (Rep. Office)
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Fiji (Multi-country Office)
- Finland (Rep. Office)
- Geneva (Rep. Office)
- Iraq (Republic of)
- Kosovo (as per UNSCR 1244)
- Lao PDR
- Mauritius & Seychelles
- Norway (Rep. Office)
- Papua New Guinea
- Programme of Assistance to the Palestinian People
- Russian Federation
- Samoa (Multi-country Office)
- São Tomé and Principe
- Saudi Arabia
- Sierra Leone
- South Africa
- South Sudan
- Sri Lanka
- Sweden (Rep. Office)
- The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
- Tokyo (Rep. Office)
- Trinidad and Tobago
- United Arab Emirates
- About Us
- News Centre
International Consultancy to support Final Evaluation of UN Women’s Project on Women lead and benefit from sustainable and inclusive Peace and Security in Uganda.
|Advertised on behalf of :|
|Location :||Kampala, UGANDA|
|Application Deadline :||15-Aug-21 (Midnight New York, USA)|
|Additional Category :||Gender Equality|
|Type of Contract :||Individual Contract|
|Post Level :||International Consultant|
|Languages Required :||English|
|Starting Date :|
(date when the selected candidate is expected to start)
|Duration of Initial Contract :||Between 1st October and 30th November 2021|
|Expected Duration of Assignment :||25 working days|
UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.
UNDP does not tolerate sexual exploitation and abuse, any kind of harassment, including sexual harassment, and discrimination. All selected candidates will, therefore, undergo rigorous reference and background checks.
UN WOMEN ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT
The United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women), grounded in the vision of equality enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, works for the elimination of discrimination against women and girls; the empowerment of women; and the achievement of equality between women and men as partners and beneficiaries of development, human rights, humanitarian action and peace and security. UN Women provides support to Member States’ efforts and priorities in meeting their gender equality goals and for building effective partnerships with civil society and other relevant actors.
UN Women operationalizes this through Flagship Programming Initiatives (FPIs) developed to achieve transformative results for gender equality and women empowerment. One such FPI is the Women Peace and Security Program, which the Uganda Country Office has been implementing over the last three years (2019 – 2021) with support from the Government of Norway. The Uganda WPS program is aligned to and contributes to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) -specifically Goal 5 on Gender Equality and Goal 16, which seeks to promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable peace and development by providing access to justice to all and to build effective, accountable, and inclusive institutions at the national and county level. UNSCR 1325 and the Goal 5 and Goal 16 clarified the critical link among gender equality, security, development and human rights.
PROGRAM OVERVIEW / RESULTS
The WPS program was developed against a backdrop of conflict and post conflict situations in Uganda including the post conflict situation in northern uganda noting that even though there is no active war, the lack of transitional justice including reconciliation and reparations, has remained a serious challenge, with little accountability for atrocities committed during the 20- year civil war. More so, Uganda has continued to experience tension before, during and after elections characterised by general unrest caused by hostility towards and from security forces, brutal arrests and violence; threats of terrorism and a rise in violent extremism notably in the Rwenzori, Eastern and Central regions of Uganda; growing insecurity of women and girls, arising from the kidnap, rape and murder of women in the municipalities of Entebbe and Nansana; land and Natural Resources Conflict.
Given the threats to peace articulated above, Uganda has since 2008 developed and implemented 3 National Action Plans (NAP) on UN SCR 1325 on Women, Peace and Security. The current NAPIII runs between 2021-2025 aiming at increasing women’s participation in the prevention and resolution of conflict, and post conflict peace building and recovery. UN Women has been supporting the Ministry of Gender, Labour and Social Development (MoGLSD) in the development, implementation and review of the NAPs 1325 since 2014.
The soon ending programme on WPS, with funding from Government of Norway, aims at achieving the following outcomes:
Programme Outcome: More commitments on women, peace and security are implemented by GoU and the UN, and more gender equality advocates influence peace and security processes
ToC Statement – WPS
If (1) an enabling environment for implementation of WPS commitments is created; if women participate in decision-making processes related to the prevention, management and resolution of conflict in a quality manner; and if the safety, physical and mental health and economic security of women and girls are assured, their human rights respected, and their specific needs met in the peacebuilding and recovery process; then (2) societies will be more peaceful & gender equal; because (3) evidence shows that women are drivers of peace and security, inclusive societies are more likely to be stable & post-conflict settings are opportunities to address underlying gender inequality barriers.
PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION
The UN Women Evaluation Policy and the UN Women Evaluation Strategic Plan 2014-2017 are the main guiding documents that set forth the principles and organizational framework for evaluation planning, conduct and follow-up in UN Women. These principles are aligned with the United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) Norms and Standards for Evaluation in the UN System and the Guidelines. The key principles for gender-responsive evaluation at UN Women are: 1) National ownership and leadership;
The WPS Program is in its third and last year of implementation and is scheduled to end in December 2021. In line with the program requirements and the UN Women evaluation policy, an end of programme evaluation is to be conducted to assess the performance of the programme. The purpose of this independent end term evaluation is to assess the project’s achievements against the set objectives, identify and document lessons learnt (including design issues, lessons and best practices that can be up-scaled or replicated), and assess how the program contributed to harnessing the capacities of women towards the goals of sustainable peace and security. It is a priority for UN Women that this end line program evaluation will be gender-responsive and human rights based in nature.
The primary intended users of this evaluation are:
Primary intended uses of this evaluation are:
Evaluation objectives (evaluation criteria and key questions)
This evaluation will specifically:
The evaluation will apply 6 OECD/DAC evaluation criteria (relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, coherence, impact and sustainability) and Human Rights and Gender Equality as an additional criterion. To the extent possible, the evaluation will analyze Value for Money (VFM) and good use of resources in other words it will establish a link between the use of funding and the performance and results of the country office.
The evaluation will seek to answer the following key evaluation questions and sub- questions:
Was the project aligned with international gender equality human rights norms?
Was the project aligned with national policies, programmes, or priorities addressing 1325 resolution?
Were the programmatic methodologies/strategies appropriate to address the identified needs of beneficiaries and stakeholders?
Was the choice of partners most relevant in addressing the program needs?
Was the choice of interventions most relevant to the situation in the target thematic areas?
Was the technical design of the project including the ToC relevant?
Did the intervention target the underlying causes of gender inequality? Including WPS?
To what extent have lessons learned been shared to inform country office programming?
To what extent have planned outputs been achieved on time?
Did the interventions contribute to the expected outcomes?
What unexpected outcomes (positive and negative) have been achieved?
What has UN Women’s contribution been to the progress of the achievement of outcomes?
Did the programme implementation partners have access to the necessary skills, knowledge and capacities needed to deliver the project?
What were the main enabling and hindering factors to achieving planned outcomes?
To what extent has WPS project interventions been mainstreamed in UN joint programming such as UNSDCF?
Efficiency and Coherence:
Were the outputs delivered appropriate to resources used?
To what extent did the UN Women programme management structure support efficiency for the project’s implementation?
What is UN Women’s comparative advantage in implementing this type of project compared with other UN entities, other stakeholders in WPS programming and key partners?
To what extent did the project’s implementation approach add value while avoiding duplication of efforts?
How well were resources and risks managed to ensure results for the project?
Did the project management team manage program implementation delays efficiently and what corrective actions were undertaken?
Was a Results Based Management system established and implemented for the project?
Is there local ownership and are there local and national champions for the intervention?
To what extent was capacity of partners developed to ensure sustainability of efforts and benefits?
What local accountability and oversight systems have been established to support the continuation of activities?
Human Rights and Gender Equality:
To what extent is the project changing the dynamics of power in relationships between different groups?
Has the project been implemented according to human rights and development effectiveness principles: Participation/empowerment; Inclusion/non-discrimination; National accountability/transparency; anti-corruption; and climate and environment?
To what extent has the program interventions generated or is expected to generate significant positive or negative, intended or unintended, higher-level (capture the significance, the scope, and the transformative nature of the effects) effects?
Duties and Responsibilities
SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION
The evaluation is an end of project evaluation and will cover all project activities implemented since December 1, 2018 to December 31, 2021. Lessons learned and documented from this process will inform implementation of the 3rd National Action Plan on 1325 and how the Country Office will design WPS programming in the future.
The evaluator will undertake an initial assessment of the availability of secondary data necessary for the evaluation. In circumstances where constraints are faced such as limited travel or accessibility to project sites, these limitations should be understood and generalizing findings should be avoided where a strong sample has not been used. In addition, cultural aspects that could impact the collection of data should be analysed and integrated into data collection methods and tools. The evaluator is expected to include adequate time for testing data collection tools.
The evaluation team is expected to undertake a rapid evaluability assessment in the Inception. This should include the following:
EVALUATION APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY
The evaluation will be an external, independent and participatory exercise, which should be completed within a timeframe of 25 days spread over a period of 2 months beginning in October 2021. The final evaluation methodology will document and analyze the distinct achievements of each programmatic pillar, while also assessing the ways in which efforts contributed to national implementation and program-level work influenced country advocacy and policy.
The evaluation shall provide evidence-based information that is credible, reliable and useful and will be based on gender and human rights principles, as defined in the UN Women Evaluation Policy and adhere to the United Nations norms and standards for evaluation.
The evaluation will employ mixed methods including desk-based review of relevant documents backed by consultation with key project stakeholders and field-based primary data collection from direct project beneficiaries. An initial desk review and brief discussions with key stakeholders will support the refinement and finalization of the methodology and analytical framework.
The evaluation is expected to follow a collaborative and participatory approach ensuring close engagement with Programme beneficiaries, implementing partners, ministries, local governments, OPM, NAPIII actors and other key stakeholders as will be informed by the stakeholder mapping process. The analysis of the application of human rights and gender equality principles in WPS interventions will be an integral part of the evaluation. Integration of human rights and gender equality issues into the evaluation requires adherence to three main principles – inclusion, participation, and fair power relations. Consequently, a case study approach will also be employed to illustrate the results in the lives of beneficiaries and key stakeholders in each of the project areas. The case studies will consider innovative approaches for engaging these actors in the documentation of Programme results, through at least one case study in each area, using tools like participatory video; significant change stories; photo exhibition; collaborative outcome reporting; and other participatory methods that prioritize the voices of beneficiaries and stakeholders.
The main recommended phases of the evaluation methodology are:
b)Intensive field-based Phase: Data collection Phase
c)Analysis and Report Writing Phase:
MANAGEMENT OF THE EVALUATION
The evaluation and quality assurance will be managed by UN Women Uganda Country Office, with technical support from both international and national consultants. While the consultant is expected to work as partners with a local consultant, the international consultant will provide overall leadership in the execution of activities and take responsibility for meeting all deliverables. The consultants will bi-laterally determine the division of labour based on their own assessment of suitability.
The international consultant will be accountable to UN Women on behalf of the team and report to the Uganda CO Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist. The evaluation will be conducted in accordance with UN Women evaluation guidelines and UNEG norms and standards. Upon completion of the evaluation, UN Women has the responsibility to prepare a management response that addresses the findings and recommendations to ensure future learning and inform implementation of their relevant programmes.
The evaluation management structure will comprise of one coordinating entity and two consultative bodies: The Evaluation Management Group and the Evaluation Reference Group. The Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation Specialist will manage the day-to-day aspects of the evaluation. This evaluation will be a participatory process and the evaluation manager will ensure consultations with all the key stakeholders as required.
The Evaluation Management Group will be responsible for management of the evaluation. It will coordinate the selection and recruitment of the evaluation team, manage contractual agreements, budget and personnel involved in the evaluation, support the reference groups, provide all necessary data to the evaluation team, facilitate communication between the evaluation team and the reference group. The Management Group will include UN Women Deputy Country Representative, M&E Specialist; Operations Manager & Regional Evaluation Specialist. The Evaluation Reference Group will provide direct oversight, safeguard independence, and give technical input over the course of the evaluation. It will provide guidance on evaluation team selection and key deliverables (Inception Report and Evaluation Report) submitted by the evaluation team. It will also support dissemination of the findings and recommendations. The Evaluation Reference Group will include: UN Women programme staff, National government partners, Development partners/donors, Civil Society partners, Regional Evaluation Specialist.
TIME FRAME AND DELIVERABLES
The evaluation will be conducted between 1 October – 31 November 2021.
The primary evaluation deliverables are:
1.Inception Report: 1 week post contract signing – 30%
This report will include a detailed evaluation methodology, revised evaluation question matrix, proposed data collection tools and analysis approach, and final evaluation work plan (with corresponding timeline).
2.Preliminary findings presentation and validation workshop with stakeholders: 3 weeks after signing - 30%
This will be presented in person or via zoom to the Reference Group for feedback. The recommendations should also be discussed in this workshop.
3. First draft of the Evaluation Report: 6 weeks after contract signing – 40%
The draft evaluation report should include all annexes summarizing the data analysis and incorporate feedback from the Evaluation Reference Group validation workshop; the final agreed upon version of the evaluation report should also include an audit trail of how comments have been integrated into the report, and all final annexes.
4. PowerPoint Presentation to Core Reference Group & Broad Reference Group on main Findings/ Recommendations and proposed dissemination strategy. 7 weeks after contract signing
5. Final Evaluation products with the following components: 8 weeks after contract signing
• Executive summary (not more than 10 pages)
• Stand-alone Eval report (Not more than 30 pages)
• Comprehensive Eval report (with all annexes)
• Evaluation comments log/audit trail
• Annexes (Separately)
6. Communications piece (popularized version of the final report): 8 weeks after contract signing
Submission of innovative knowledge products that capture the evaluation findings in a clear and concise manner, e.g., video, brief with infographics, etc, in line with the UN Women branding guidelines.
ETHICAL CODE OF CONDUCT
UN Women has developed the UN Women Evaluation Consultants Agreement Form for evaluators that must be signed as part of the contracting process, which is based on the UNEG Ethical Guidelines and Code of Conduct. The signed Agreement will be annexed to the consultant contract. The UNEG Guidelines note the importance of ethical conduct for the following reasons:
The evaluator is expected to provide a detailed plan on how the following principles will be ensured throughout the evaluation (see UNEG Ethical Guidance for descriptions): 1) Respect for dignity and diversity; 2) Right to self-determination; 3) Fair representation; 4) Compliance with codes for vulnerable groups (e.g., ethics of research involving young children or vulnerable groups); 5) Redress; 6) Confidentiality; and 7) Avoidance of harm.
Specific safeguards must be put in place to protect the safety (both physical and psychological) of both respondents and those collecting the data. These should include:
As with the other stages of the evaluation, involvement of stakeholders should not interfere with the impartiality of the evaluation.
The evaluator has the final judgment on the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the evaluation report, and the evaluator must be protected from pressures to change information in the report.
Additionally, if the evaluator identifies issues of wrongdoing, fraud or other unethical conduct, UN Women procedures must be followed, and confidentiality be maintained. The UN Women Legal Framework for Addressing Non-Compliance with UN Standards of Conduct, and accompanying policies protecting against retaliation and prohibiting harassment and abuse of authority, provide a cohesive framework aimed at creating and maintaining a harmonious working environment, ensuring that staff members do not engage in any wrongdoing and that all allegations of wrongdoing are reported promptly, investigated, and appropriate action taken to achieve accountability. The UN Women Legal Framework for Addressing Non-Compliance with UN Standards of Conduct defines misconduct and the mechanisms within UN Women for reporting and investigating. More information can be provided by UN Women if required.
Required Skills and Experience
With this Terms of Reference, UN Women is seeking to recruit an international consultant as the team lead under SSA contract for a period of 25 days spread between two months collaboratively working with a national consultant.
The International Consultant is expected is expected to have the following expertise:
Interested qualified individual consultants must apply online latest by 15th August 2021. Candidates should submit one PDF File attachment containing: