- UNDP around the world
Many of UNDP's relationships with countries and territories on the ground exceed 60 years. Find details on our successes and ongoing work.
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Burkina Faso
- Cape Verde
- Central African Republic
- Congo (Dem. Republic of)
- Congo (Republic of)
- Costa Rica
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Democratic People's Republic of Korea
- Denmark (Rep. Office)
- Dominican Republic
- E.U (Rep. Office)
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Fiji (Multi-country Office)
- Finland (Rep. Office)
- Geneva (Rep. Office)
- Iraq (Republic of)
- Kosovo (as per UNSCR 1244)
- Lao PDR
- Mauritius & Seychelles
- Norway (Rep. Office)
- Papua New Guinea
- Programme of Assistance to the Palestinian People
- Russian Federation
- Samoa (Multi-country Office)
- São Tomé and Principe
- Saudi Arabia
- Sierra Leone
- South Africa
- South Sudan
- Sri Lanka
- Sweden (Rep. Office)
- The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
- Tokyo (Rep. Office)
- Trinidad and Tobago
- United Arab Emirates
- About Us
- News Centre
INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT – MID-TERM EVALUATION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS COORDINATION CENTRE (SDGCC) PROGRAMME OF UNDP
|Location :||Delhi/Home based, INDIA|
|Application Deadline :||23-Sep-21 (Midnight New York, USA)|
|Type of Contract :||Individual Contract|
|Post Level :||National Consultant|
|Languages Required :||English|
|Duration of Initial Contract :||December 2021|
UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.
UNDP does not tolerate sexual exploitation and abuse, any kind of harassment, including sexual harassment, and discrimination. All selected candidates will, therefore, undergo rigorous reference and background checks.
The UN General Assembly, and all its 193-member countries, in September 2015 adopted a global development vision entitled Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. This 2030 Agenda was designed as a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity. It lays out 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets, to stimulate global action over the next 15 years on issues critical to humanity and the planet. United Nations as mandated is actively working with the national and state governments to ensure the dreams of 1.3 billion people living in one of the fastest growing economy of the world. Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) requires new capacities and ways of working in coordination with all stakeholders, with strong institutional set-ups. These institutional set-ups need to be able to assist sub-national governments in integrated policy making, create inter-linkages and synergies, develop strong monitoring systems, and coordination among all.
India is actively pursuing to actualize the ambitious goals of ‘Transforming the World by 2030’ and in this pursuit National Institution for Transforming India (NITI) Aayog and Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation (MoSPI) are spearheading initiatives through a systematic and coordinated manner. In view of India’s commitment to the 2030 Agenda, State Governments have set ambitious targets for itself for achieving the SDGs within the state and formulation of the Vision 2030 document is a first step in this direction. Therefore, to effectively implement the 2030 Agenda, mobilizing and equipping public institutions will be required. 1 In the given context, UNDP proposed that State Governments created and harboured a special purpose vehicle called the Sustainable Development Goals the state’s Planning/Economics and Statistics/Finance Departments devoted solely to ensure effective governance and convergence between departments and stakeholders for achieving the SDGs.
UNDP has established SDGCC’s in the States of Haryana, Nagaland, Punjab, Uttarakhand and Karnataka. In addition to this, UNDP is in discussion with couple of States for establishing partnership for setting up the Special Purpose Vehicle of SDGCC. As it is more than two years since the proof of concept of SDGCC was piloted, it has been decided that a mid-term appraisal be carried out to evaluate the contributions of SDGCCs for achieving the global goals in the State and to identify course corrections to ensure that the signature solution of UNDP remains relevant at the emerging development contexts. With just 10 years to go, an ambitious global effort is underway to deliver the 2030 promise—by mobilizing more governments, civil society, businesses and calling on all people to make the Global Goals their own.
Mid-term Evaluation purpose, scope and objectives
UNDP has implemented SDGCC projects in five states with the objective of building internal state capacity on SDGs and support public digital literacy, awareness creation, high quality knowledge management and capacity building system and partnerships; develop a communication strategy as well as IEC materials for making government functionaries and the public aware of their roles & responsibilities to achieve SDG VISION for the state; and coordinate SDG Implementation and localization at the districts / village level; analyse and propose strategies, schemes towards acceleration of progress towards SDGs. Further, SDGCCs were set up to design monitoring and evaluation systems to track the states progress against the SDG goals, targets and indicators, including third party monitoring mechanisms; develop and introduce tools using technology, including dashboards, citizen feedback loops, real-time monitoring technologies like sensors; and institute a mechanism & suggest policy level change for efficient coordination to implement SDG VISION through establishment of technical and management support group at appropriate levels. They were also instituted to facilitate the application of big data analytics for decision making; undertake bottleneck analysis in priority areas to assess service delivery bottlenecks, particularly at the last mile and propose solutions leveraging disruptive technologies; and help mobilize human, financial and physical resources and manage their utilization. Thus, over two years of implementation SDGCCs have made great strides in realizing the SDGs across 5 states.
In light of the progress made so far in terms of achieving SDG goals, there is need to undertake a Mid-term Evaluation (MTE) of the SDGCCs in the selected states. The Mid-term project evaluation will be conducted to identify potential project implementation issues, assess on-going progress towards the achievement of objectives, relevance and performance of the project as compared to the project document, identify and document lessons, and to make recommendations regarding specific actions that might be taken to improve the project implementation, provide recommendation in improving the project implementation during the remaining years. The Mid-term project evaluation is expected to serve as a means of validating or filling the gaps in the initial assessment of relevance, effectiveness and efficiency obtained from monitoring. The project evaluation provides the opportunity to assess project’s success or failure and prompt necessary adjustments /re-evaluations in accordance with Government’s evolved priorities and needs. Such recalibration should be reflected in the ongoing or subsequent action plans and activities.
MTE would map the progress and respond to key questions of the concerned stakeholders (SDGCC Program Unit, UNDP state project unit, CBO/NGO Partners) so that there is adequate and timely information available for pending decisions or action. An issue may concern the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness or sustainability of the intervention. In addition, MTE will address how the intervention need to strengthen the application of the rights-based approach and mainstream gender in development efforts. Overall, MTE would be critical in evaluating the progress made under the SDGCC projects, with broad contours of evaluations analysing the following:
The evaluation will cover all the planned outputs and outcomes under the project, with particular attention to synergies between the components and contribution to SDGs. The evaluation will discuss, throughout the evaluation questions, how the project is addressing its main issue and the cross-cutting themes. The mid-term evaluation is expected to provide guidance for recalibrated efforts from SDGCCs to achieve Global Goals in the reference states.
Duties and Responsibilities
The primary responsibility of the Consultant is to develop a Mid-Term Evaluation Report on the current progress of SDGCCs in India. The evaluation should involve mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative), engaging with key stakeholders of the project at all levels during the design, field work, validation and reporting stages. To collect the data for analysis, the evaluation will make use of the surveys and semi-structured interviews.
The Consultant will be formally working under the supervision of the Policy Specialist, SDGs, UNDP India.
The key deliverables under the Mid Term Evaluations to include:
The final methodological approach including interview schedule, and data to be used in the evaluation should be clearly outlined in the inception report and be fully discussed and agreed with UNDP/SDGCC.
The Project Manager would be representative of the UNDP/SDGCC project management team responsible for Mid-term evaluation study. He/she will provide logistical support to the Individual Consultant (Evaluator) and will assist in organizing a detailed MTE mission agenda. He /she will also ensure that all relevant documentations are up to date and easily accessible (in electronic form in a space such as Google Drive) by the Evaluator from the first day of the contract (desk review phase).
He /she would be primarily responsible for discussion with the Evaluator on the SDGCC Project and the TOR, providing feedback on inception report, review of the Draft MTE report and adjustments by the Evaluator, circulate draft MTE report among key stakeholders and receive feedback, and consolidate feedback and share with the Evaluator for incorporation in the final MTE report.
The Mid Term evaluation will be conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the UNEG ‘Ethical Guidelines for Evaluation’.3
A length of 40 to 60 pages including executive summary is suggested.
Required Skills and Experience
Language Requirement: English
The award of the contract shall be made to the individual consultant whose offer has been evaluated and determined as Responsive to the requirement. Having received the highest score out of a pre-determined set of weighted technical and financial criteria specific to the solicitation.
Only candidates obtaining a minimum of 49 points (70% of the total technical points) would be considered for the Financial Evaluation;
Technical Criteria (70% of the total evaluation) – Consultants to submit clear evidence on their experience and competency as per the technical criteria suggested.
1. Criteria 1: Prior Experience (30%)
2. Criteria 2: Demonstrated Knowledge on Sustainable Development Goals (25%)
3. Criteria 3: Multi-stakeholder coordination (15%)
Technically qualified consultants will be requested to submit their lump sum rate i.e. consultants who score more than 70% i.e. 49 marks with respect to the above-mentioned evaluation criteria. Consultant should not specify their consultancy fee on their CV or with the submission. The CV will not be evaluated further in case the consultant submits the same.
Payment Scheduled: Payments will be deliverable linked per the following schedule of payments:
UNDP strives to have a workforce which reflects diversity and gender balance, and applies an equal opportunities approach. All selection is on merit. Qualified Women Candidates are Strongly Encouraged to Apply.