Background
In the last decade, Sierra Leone experienced improved investment to strengthen reform initiatives within the justice sector, human rights protection, peace and social cohesion. This was due to the recognition that supporting rule of law and human rights are prerequisites to achieving sustainable peace, promoting social cohesion and peacebuilding which contributes to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The delivery of justice and human rights services as well as the maintenance of peace and social cohesion is shaped by persisting challenges relating to people’s access to justice particularly vulnerable groups including women and children, victims of human rights violation with an essentially polarized political environment that hampers the consolidation of peaceful initiatives. Poor and limited court infrastructure and paucity of legal personnel affect the capacity of justice sector institutions to respond to the justice needs and deliver services to the population. The Human Rights Commission of Sierra Leone (HRCSL) is also challenged in carrying out its human right protection and promotion mandate amidst prevalent human rights issues in remote communities. In 2020, the Rule of Law (ROL) and Sustaining Peace and Social Cohesion Portfolio Programme (2020-2023) was developed incorporating components to strengthen capacity of the HRCSL (2019-2020) to effectively deliver on its statutory mandate, enhance the ability of the Judiciary and the justice sector to expedite justice service delivery with focus on strengthening access to justice for women and girls at community level, and supporting initiatives geared toward promoting peace and social cohesion. The project seeks to contribute to the following four outputs:
In 2021, the support to strengthening capacity of the HRCSL phase II project was developed to span from April 2021 to December 2022. The overall objective of the programme is to consolidate gains made during the previous rule of law and human rights project through support to initiatives aimed at strengthening capacity of justice sector and human rights institution, structures, and processes. Strategically, the project contributes to the UNDP Sierra Leone Country Programme Document (2020-2023) through strengthening capacities of oversight institutions and fostering access to justice and protection of fundamental human rights within the Inclusive Democratic Governance Cluster (CPD 2020-2023 P.5-6).[1] The project complements the efforts of the
. . |
Duties and Responsibilities
The evaluation will focus mainly on assessing the achievements of the various components within the Rule of Law, Sustaining Peace and Social Cohesion Portfolio document. It will focus on assessing the impact of programme interventions spanning from July 2020 to present. Specifically, it will examine the impact of UNDP’s support to the SLCS with a focus on the rehabilitation and reintegration of inmates as well as decongestion of overcrowded facilities including vocational training and earning scheme, water and sanitation within correctional centres, capacity strengthening of the civil society and Judiciary to address sexual offences, and support to IPCB and LAB provision of legal aid services to the vulnerable in rural communities and persons in detention. Focus will as well be placed on efforts towards sustaining peace and social cohesion through key specific interventions including the support and impact of the Grievance Redress Committees (GRC) and Multi-Stakeholder Platforms (MSP), and Community Development Funds (CDF). The Assessment will also examine the innovative approach of partnership between private sector, government and civil society in conflict management. The consultancy will further explore the impact of programme support aimed at empowering youth at risk as resources for sustaining peace and community resilience in Tonkolili and Kenema districts in Sierra Leone through civic education, capacity building and increase their representation in local decision-making structures and providing psychoeducation on drug and substance abuse to increase reintegration and inclusion in decision-making of youth-at-risk. The evaluation of the support to the Human Rights Commission will examine project interventions relating to institutional capacity (technical, policy and legal) strengthening, complaint handling (mobile and office-based) procedures, HRCSL engagement on the UPR, Business and Human Rights (BHR), capacity building support to District Human Rights Committee (DHRCs) and the establishment human rights and peace clubs at district level. Specific objectives of the evaluation include:
|
Evaluation criteria and key questions |
The evaluation will follow the Organization of Economic Cooperation Development (OECD), Development Assistance Committee (DAC)’s evaluation criteria – relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability. Partnership, Gender Empowerment and Social Inclusion (GESI) and human rights will be added as cross cutting criteria. The guiding questions outlined below should be further refined by the consultant and agreed with UNDP prior to the commencement of the evaluation: The assessment on the contribution of the projects to development results through its activities will be made in accordance with the following evaluation criteria:
Relevance
Coherence
Efficiency
Effectiveness
Impact
Are the interventions leading to other changes, including “scalable” or “replicable” results? How will the interventions contribute to changing society for the better?
Sustainability
Human right, Gender equality and disability inclusion
|
Evaluation methodology |
The methodology mentioned in this section is indicative. The evaluators should propose a final detail methodological framework in the inception report based on the systematic review of the portfolio documents. Evaluators should adopt both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The quantitative data includes project data. The qualitative data assessment should include the secondary project data for more insight into the project's accomplishments and lessons learned. In addition, the evaluators will collect qualitative data from the field through interviews and observation. The evaluation stages include (i) desk review, (ii) prepare inception report, (iii) field visits to project’s provinces and districts to collect data, (iv) data analysis and interpretation, and (v) evaluation report writing and finalization. The consultants/evaluators will be responsible for designing appropriate theory-based evaluation methodology including designing tools, developing questionnaire and other instruments for data collection and analysis. A kick-off meeting should be organized with UNDP and evaluation partners to discuss data collection plan, expectations, and tools and techniques to be adhered for collection of primary information. The consultants should use, but not limited, the following methods for data collection: Desk review The evaluators should review portfolio documents which includes portfolio notes, project proposals, progress reports, consolidated quarterly and annual reports, minutes of project board meetings, project modification document, knowledge products, research, monitoring reports and legal review reports, communication and visibility reports, case stories, IEC Materials etc. Please see annex -1 for relevant portfolio documents. In addition, the evaluators will review literatures, relevant research, and donors’ and government’s reports. Interview/Consultation The consultants will conduct in-depth key informant interviews (online or virtual) to gather primary data from key stakeholders. For this, evaluators should develop checklist and evaluation questions. This includes interviewing representatives from donors and partners. The evaluators also conduct group interview, Focus Group discussion, with portfolio stakeholders and beneficiaries. Interview should also include relevant UN agencies and other implementing partners. While organizing interviews and consultations with beneficiaries, the evaluators should ensure the participation of women, persons with disabilities and other vulnerable groups. Field observation Evaluators are expected to directly observe portfolio interventions in provinces and districts. This also includes functioning of the project supported community and stakeholder’s groups and infrastructures. The evaluators will follow the COVID-19 protocols while during the mission. If field mission is not possible due to COVID-19 crisis, it should be discussed and mutually agreed with UNDP. Case story Using thematic case studies, evaluators may assess the impact of the project on the beneficiaries, particularly the benefits they accrued from the project and the visible changes in their lives, and overall well-being. The gender and social inclusion should be well considered while capturing and documenting the stories in the report. |
Deliverables and timelines | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under the supervision of the UNDP Rule of Law Programme Specialist, and in coordination with the UNDP Program Support Unit (PSU) and in collaboration with relevant partners, the Consultants will accomplish the following deliverables in accordance with the stipulated timelines covering a total period of Thirty (30) working days.
|
Competencies
Evaluation team and their competencies |
This Mid-term evaluation will be conducted by two external independent consultants, one international (team leader) and one national expert. Both consultants shall be specialists on Justice and have knowledge of Justice and Human Rights initiatives in Africa. The International consultant will be responsible for the achievements of the objective of the evaluation and for the submission of the deliverable, whilst the national consultant will be providing overall support to the team leader, and any other task required throughout the evaluation process. Corporate Competencies
Professionalism
Planning & Organizing
|
Ethical considerations |
This evaluation will be conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the UNEG ‘Ethical Guidelines for Evaluation. The contractors must safeguard the rights and confidentiality of information providers, interviewees, and stakeholders through measures to ensure compliance with legal and other relevant codes governing collection of data and reporting on data. The contractors must also ensure security of collected information before and after the evaluation and protocols to ensure anonymity and confidentiality of sources of information where that is expected. The information knowledge and data gathered in the evaluation process must also be solely used for the evaluation and not for other uses without the express authorization of UNDP and partners. The contractors will be held to the highest ethical standards and are required to sign a Code of Conduct upon acceptance of the assignment. |
Required Skills and Experience
Required qualification and experience | |
Education:
|
|
Experience:
|
|
Language Requirements:
|
|