The UNDP Oslo Governance Centre (OGC) is UNDP’s dedicated Global Policy Centre for Governance issues, which advances global dialogue and knowledge on inclusive and transformative governance for peaceful, just and inclusive societies. The Centre builds knowledge, insight and data through drawing on the experience of practitioners, policymakers and researchers as well as stimulating global discourse and dialogue on key governance questions in the world today. OGC focuses on generating lessons from applied research and strengthening the evidence base on governance themes to inform policy development.
Relaunched in mid-2022, the Centre will leverage strong partnerships with key knowledge and research institutions to create and disseminate knowledge and insights. Its research and partnership function entails a constant horizon scan for new and emerging governance issues and cutting-edge knowledge. As an insight and knowledge generator that focusses on applied research, the Centre will connect practitioners and policymakers to researchers, and act as an arena for testing theory against practice.
In May 2022, Oslo Governance Centre (OGC) hosted the Power, Politics and Peace conference. It sought to shed light on how the world is facing multiple governance crises at the same time and launched several research products. To deepen and action conversations that started at OGC’s Power, Politics and Peace conference and to inform the Centre’s work over the next 1-2 years, OGC will hold a two-day workshop in mid-November 2022, bringing together researchers, practitioners and policy-makers to explore four challenges and opportunities for inclusive governance that are emerging strongly from global discussions that OGC has observed and analysed (working titles):
- Facing Disruption and Increasing Transparency: How to deliver public services in times of crisis and uncertainty? (Financial integrity)
- Protecting information integrity to defend democratic values: What collective action is needed to reduce the impact of information pollution on open public spheres and informed civic engagement? (Information integrity)
- Managing Complexity while Building Consensus: How to govern the transition to a fair green future? (Just, green transition)
- Under Pressure and for a Higher Purpose: How to foster transformational leadership? (Transformational leadership)
The theme on “Facing Disruption and Increasing Transparency” relates to understanding ways on how to deliver quality public services in times of crisis and uncertainty. For the theme on Financial Integrity, the Oslo Governance Centre is looking for an expert to prepare, document and consolidate results from the workshop.
In times of crisis and uncertainty, integrity is often the first victim: When decision-making becomes urgent and implementation hectic and when there is more discretion in decision-making and allocation of resources through relaxed safeguards on transparency, oversights and accountability mechanisms, such as compliance, procurement practices, and open access to data, vested interests show up and can be harder to manage through procedural standards. The lack of sufficient accountability and oversight mechanisms significantly increase the risks of corruption and fraud, such as funds being risked getting siphoned off and contracts being awarded through favouritism.
On the other hand, evidence also suggests that government institutions are more agile and resilient to crisis response and recovery if governments are committed to ensuring transparency, openness, and access to information, applying a whole-of-government approach with a clear role for audit and oversight institutions, and building trust through a whole-of-society approach to the crisis where citizens and civil society constructively engage and participate in response and recovery activities.
The process will draw on established approaches such as strategic foresighting and systems thinking and entail three main steps: 1) background papers on each theme that frame, outline and guide the discussions, 2) the two-day workshop, including roundtable discussions on each theme as well as plenary sessions and 3) discussion notes on each (refined) theme that draw on the exchanges to point out aspects that are urgent and possible to address and that will be published.
Institutional Arrangement / Reporting Relationships
The IC will work closely with OGC staff and relevant staff across the global teams.
Schedule of Payments
The consultancy is lump sum based and the consultant will be paid as per deliverables.
The consultant is expected to travel to Oslo for approximately 10 days around the workshop, which is planned for mid-November, dates to be confirmed.
The application is a two-step process. Failing to comply with the submission process may result in disqualifying the applications.
Step 1: Submission of technical proposal.
Step 1: Interested individual consultants must include the following documents when submitting the applications in UNDP job shop. Please note that only 1 (one) file can be uploaded, therefore, please include all documents in one file:
- Personal History Form (P11), indicating all past experience from similar projects, as well as the contact details (email and telephone number) of the candidate and at least three (3) professional references).
- Brief description of why the individual considers him/herself as the most suitable for the assignment. Please indicate available start date.
- Please suggest at least five relevant collaborative partners that would be useful for the process.
- Please submit a relevant publication on the topic that you have authored or led.
Step 2: Submission of Financial Proposals:
Applicants are required to submit their all-inclusive lump sum offer in US Dollars for this consultancy, using the financial proposal template available here: https://popp.undp.org/_layouts/15/WopiFrame.aspx?sourcedoc=/UNDP_POPP_DOCUMENT_LIBRARY/Public/PSU_%20Individual%20Contract_Offerors%20Letter%20to%20UNDP%20Confirming%20Interest%20and%20Availability.docx&action=default
Please fill in section A I on page 4. The sum of AI will be the “all-inclusive lump sum” to be filled in on page 1, e).
The financial proposal should be sent via email to email@example.com with the following subject heading: “Financial Proposal – Consultant – Future Governance: Financial Integrity” by the application deadline. Proposals received after the deadline may be rejected. In order to assist the requesting unit in the comparison of financial proposals, the financial proposal should be all-inclusive lump sum fee, however must include a detailed breakdown of the cost (section AI). The term ‘all-inclusive’ implies that all costs (professional fees, assignment related travel expenses to join the duty station, communications, tax, utilities, consumables, insurance, etc.) that could possibly be incurred by the Contractor are already factored into the financial proposal.
Criteria for selection:
Only those candidates who meet the minimum level of education and relevant years of experience requirements will be considered for the consultancy. The shortlisted candidates will be scored based on a review of their functional competencies and other criteria as described above. The candidates with the highest scores may also be invited for interviews.
Combined scoring method: where the qualifications and competencies will be weighted a max of 70%, and combined with the price offer which will be weighted a max of 30%.
Method: cumulative analysis method will be used to evaluate proposals.
When using this weighted scoring method, the award of the contract will be made to the individual consultant whose offer has been evaluated and determined as:
Responsive / compliant / acceptable; and
Having received the highest score out of a pre-determined set of weighted technical and financial criteria specific to the solicitation.
Technical criteria weight: 70 (70% of total obtainable scores):
Only those candidates who meet the minimum level of education and relevant years of experience requirements will be considered for the technical evaluation. The technical evaluation will include a desk review and may include interviews with shortlisted candidates.
The technical evaluation of shortlisted candidates will be done on the basis of a review of the following:
- Experience with applied research or analysis on domestic resource mobilization, financial integrity, public service delivery, transparency and/or accountability, ideally from a policy and/or programming perspective (25%);
- Previous work with or knowledge of relevant research institutions and other key stakeholders working on domestic resource mobilization, financial integrity, public service delivery, transparency and/or accountability (15%)
- Demonstrated ability to organise and structure information and excellent and proven writing skills in English to make research accessible to policy-makers and practitioners (15%)
- Previous relevant experience with UN or UNDP policy and programming processes at global, regional or country level (15%).
Financial criteria weight: 30 (30% of total obtainable scores).
Only candidates obtaining a minimum of 49 points (70%) on the technical part will be considered for the financial evaluation.
Criteria for financial evaluation (30 points maximum):
The following formula will be used to evaluate financial proposal:
p = y (µ/z), where
p = points for the financial proposal being evaluated
y = maximum number of points for the financial proposal:
µ=price of the lowest priced proposal:
z = price of the proposal being evaluated:
The award of contract will be made to the individual consultant who receives the highest combined score out of the weighted technical and financial criteria as specified above.
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS_INDIVIDUAL CONSULTANT (IC)