- UNDP around the world
Many of UNDP's relationships with countries and territories on the ground exceed 60 years. Find details on our successes and ongoing work.
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Burkina Faso
- Cape Verde
- Central African Republic
- Congo (Dem. Republic of)
- Congo (Republic of)
- Costa Rica
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Democratic People's Republic of Korea
- Denmark (Rep. Office)
- Dominican Republic
- E.U (Rep. Office)
- El Salvador
- Equatorial Guinea
- Fiji (Multi-country Office)
- Finland (Rep. Office)
- Geneva (Rep. Office)
- Iraq (Republic of)
- Kosovo (as per UNSCR 1244)
- Lao PDR
- Mauritius & Seychelles
- Norway (Rep. Office)
- Papua New Guinea
- Programme of Assistance to the Palestinian People
- Russian Federation
- Samoa (Multi-country Office)
- São Tomé and Principe
- Saudi Arabia
- Sierra Leone
- South Africa
- South Sudan
- Sri Lanka
- Sweden (Rep. Office)
- The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
- Tokyo (Rep. Office)
- Trinidad and Tobago
- United Arab Emirates
- About Us
- News Centre
Outcome Evaluation Consultant-Enhanced Policies and Strategies for Sustainable Use of Natural Resources and the Environment
|Location :||Riyadh, SAUDI ARABIA|
|Application Deadline :||09-Jul-15 (Midnight New York, USA)|
|Additional Category :||Climate & Disaster Resilience|
|Type of Contract :||Individual Contract|
|Post Level :||International Consultant|
|Languages Required :||English|
|Starting Date :|
(date when the selected candidate is expected to start)
|Duration of Initial Contract :||15 Working days|
In accordance with the Evaluation plan of the UNDP County Office in Saudi Arabia, an outcome evaluation is scheduled to be conducted at the end of Q3 2015 to evaluate progress made towards the following Country Programme outcome – Outcome II: “Enhanced Policies and Strategies for Sustainable Use of Natural Resources and the Environment”. In this context, UNDP Saudi Arabia is seeking to evaluate the contribution of its projects to the achievement of the above mentioned outcome.
Brief description of the Outcome
The 9th National Development Plan (NDP 2010-14) for Saudi Arabia has the overall theme of sustaining development with a record allocated budget of $385 billion, a 67% increase from the 8th NDP, targeted at six goals: improving standards of living, regional development, economic diversification, knowledge-based economy and competitiveness, and human resources including youth and women. Although the 10th NDP has yet to be released, sustainability in its three pillars (social, environmental and economic) remains the leading concern. Saudi Arabia (KSA) has made great progress in recent years with rise in HDI to 0.836 in 2013 placing it in the Very High Human Development category. As noted in 2009 National MDG Report, ten of eleven targets have been or would be reached by 2015. About 1.63% of Saudi families live under $2/day (2005) largely in remote rural communities. As a G20 member and largest economy in the region, KSA is a global partner in development.
As noted by UNDP’s MDG Strategy for the Arab Region, where breakthroughs to MDG achievement have already been made as in KSA, a key focus is on the need for sustainability of development results. Developed with UNDP support, the 9th NDP aims to reinforce KSAs progress and support its sustainability. As noted therein, KSA relies on the oil sector for 90% of public revenues, 45% of GDP, and 90% of export earnings, while also facing high unemployment of 14.4% (2005). KSA seeks to diversify the economy beyond oil exports and create future employment opportunities, including development of a knowledge-based economy and geographic diversification of growth and increased share of private sector-generated GDP alongside greater effectiveness of local administration. KSA also invests in a new generation of universities to support future employment needs. Industrialization and urbanization are leading to rising ecological footprints with policy solutions to resource scarcity. This has been identified as a clear priority in the NDP for energy conservation, renewable energy, and water conservation as groundwater scarcity sets in and pollution impacts and climate risks to human development emerge.
An Outcome Evaluation on Development Policy found UNDP’s positive role in shifting focus towards sustainability of results and recommended future focus on social, environment and economic pillars of sustainable development. Increased emphasis was advised for results-based management and connecting partners to global partnerships.
The second Outcome Evaluation for the KSA Country Programme relating to Enhanced Policies and Strategies for Sustainable Use of Natural Resources and the Environment is to be held during September 2015. The ability to address energy efficiency and conservation of natural resources is one of the pillars that will define the sustainability of development in KSA. The baseline for the outcome stood at 96% energy intensity and 12.1 per capita solid waste generation. Outcome targets for 2015 specify a significant decrease in per capita solid waste generation and energy intensity per unit GDP.
UNDP’s cooperation focuses on capacities to design and implement energy efficiency policies, South-South Cooperation’s on the matter, capacity development of Nationals to carry on with sustainable development in terms of Water Conservation, Waste Management and clean energy. This includes use of global partnerships to share best practices.
Main outputs and initiatives expected to have contributed to the outcome
The main outputs and initiatives that have contributed to the outcome are contained within the following projects outlined in the below:
The second phase of a capacity development programme for the new Saudi Energy Efficiency Centre to develop Energy Efficiency Policy and Regulations.
Capacity development for sustainable development and management of water resources in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Developing a sustainable waste management strategy for AMANA and improving road and public transport services by applying intelligent transport systems.
To assist the Royal Commission at Yanbu (RCY) in the evaluation of its continued efforts towards a sustainable environment in Madinat Yanbu Al-Sinaiyah and to ensure that Yanbu is recognised as a leader and trend setter in sustainability.
Duties and Responsibilities
Scope of the Outcome Evaluation
The outcome evaluation will include four standard categories of analysis (i.e. an assessment of progress towards the outcome, an assessment of the factors affecting the outcome, an assessment of key UNDP contributions to outcome, and an assessment of the partnership strategy used). The scope of the evaluation will be determined by the following questions:
Outcome status: What was the origin of the outcome and its constituent interventions? How were the past experience, findings and recommendations of previous evaluations, and dialogue with stakeholders used in design of outputs? What was the adequacy level of background work carried out? Has the outcome been achieved and, if not, is there any progress made towards its achievement? What is the balance effort needed and the suitability of pursuing the achievement of the outcome? What innovative approaches were tried and capacities developed through UNDP assistance?
Underlying factors: What are the underlying factors beyond UNDP’s control that influenced the outcome? What were the key assumptions made, internal and external factors? What are the substantive design issues from the key implementation and/or management capacities to issues including the timeliness of outputs, the degree of stakeholder and partner involvement in the completion of the outputs, and how processes were managed/carried out?
UNDP contribution: What is the relevance of the outcome and the constituent components specifically for UNDP assistance? Can UNDP funded constituent outputs and other interventions—including the outputs, programmes, projects and soft and hard assistance—be credibly linked to achievement of the outcome?
Partnership strategy: Was UNDP’s partnership strategy appropriate and effective? What were the partnerships formed? How did partnerships arise? What was the role of UNDP? How did the partnership contribute to the achievement of the outcome? How did they function and sustain? What was the level of the participation of stakeholders? Who were the key beneficiaries and their major perceptions?
Expected Outcome Evaluation Outputs:
Evaluation Report which includes, at least:
Methodology of Outcome Evaluation
Outcome evaluations have shifted away from the older approach of assessing project results against project objectives towards an assessment of how these results contribute, together with the assistance of partners, to a change in development conditions. Outcomes are influenced by a full range of UNDP activities (projects, programmes, non-project activities and “soft” assistance within and outside of projects) as well as the activities of other development actors. Therefore, a number of variables beyond the projects need to be considered during the evaluation. The evaluation must provide evidence-based information that is credible, reliable and useful. It must be easily understood by UNDP partners.
Information on the methodologies is given in Guidelines for Evaluators, issued by Evaluation Office, UNDP. The evaluator is expected to use all relevant methods to obtain data and information for their analysis and drawing up of findings, conclusions, lessons learned and recommendations. An outline of an evaluation approach is provided below; however it should be made clear that the evaluation consultant/team is responsible for revising the approach as necessary. Any changes should be in-line with international criteria and professional norms and standards (as adopted by the UN Evaluation Group). They must be also cleared by UNDP before being applied by the evaluation consultant/team.
Required Skills and Experience
UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.
UNDP does not tolerate sexual exploitation and abuse, any kind of harassment, including sexual harassment, and discrimination. All selected candidates will, therefore, undergo rigorous reference and background checks.