Background
The Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) of the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) conducts Independent Country Programme Evaluations (ICPEs), corporate thematic evaluations (global and regional level), and institutional evaluations. In addition, the IEO also supports the Administrator’s efforts to strengthen the methodology and conduct of decentralised evaluations, i.e., evaluations carried out by the programme units of UNDP. The evaluations capture and demonstrate UNDP contributions to development results and related factors, and are carried out within the overall provisions contained in the UNDP Evaluation Policy[1].
To strengthen methodological quality and consistency of evaluations and standardise evaluation processes, IEO is commissioning background methodology papers in select areas for which it is seeking external consultants.
[1] UNDP Evaluation Policy, 2016
Duties and Responsibilities
Scope
Two consultants will be hired to produce the following background methodology papers. Tasks will be divided among them based on their skillsets and time availability.
- Methodology review of corporate thematic evaluations: IEO has used a variety of methods in its previous evaluations including country case studies, surveys, desk reviews and meta-synthesis of evaluations. The consultant will provide methodology (approach and theory of change) and methods suggestions for improvements based on a review of approaches and methods used in IEO corporate thematic evaluations, as well as relevant methods and approaches used by other evaluation organisations that conduct evaluations of similar scale and scope.
- Review of the use of evaluation criteria: In 2005, the United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) adopted the OECD/DAC criteria of relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability, and impact to frame its evaluations. According to the UNEG standards, OECD/DAC criteria and questions should serve as a guide, but it is not compulsory to use all criteria in an evaluation. UNDP evaluations over the past decade largely used relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability criteria in both independent as well as decentralised evaluations. The consultant will analyse the application of these criteria (relevance, usefulness and measurement issues) in the UNDP evaluations and re-think their use in future evaluation, especially in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The review should include recommendations on alternative criteria.
- Review of country case study method in corporate thematic evaluations: The consultant will review the application of country case studies in UNDP corporate thematic evaluations, relevant external organisations and wider literature. The consultant will present approaches and options that can be used for future corporate evaluations.
Tasks
The consultant will conduct a rapid review of key existing documents, including the review of IEO evaluations, other relevant literature, manuals and training materials, and will remotely conduct any necessary interviews. Background methodology papers of 15-20 pages will be produced on each topic.
Timeframe
The consultancy is a combined 35 working days from date of contract signing to 30 November 2017. This will be divided between the two consultants, according to their specific tasks.
Competencies
Corporate Competencies
Functional Competencies
Development and Operational Effectiveness
|
Required Skills and Experience
Education:
- A social or behavioral science education at the master’s level and above.
Experience:
- Over 15 years of international development experience;
- An evaluation expert who has conducted extensive development evaluation or complex evaluations;
- Familiarity with IEO’S corporate thematic evaluations and ICPEs (previously, ADRs); and
- Strong background in both quantitative and qualitative methods for evaluation.
Language:
- Fluency in English required.
Application Instructions
The following documents should be uploaded as one document onto UNDP Jobs site:
- Personal CV or P11, indicating all past experience from similar projects, as well as the contact details (email and telephone number) of at least three (3) professional references;
- A completed Confirmation of Interest and Submission of Financial Proposal Form.