Background

Central Africa is home to the second largest tropical rainforest in the world. Forest loss is accelerating despite ongoing efforts, as government action alone has not been sufficient to establish an effective balance between the interests of the forest and of economic development. On this basis, a coalition of willing donors – the European Union, the Federal Republic of Germany, the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of France and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland – together with Central African partner countries – Central African Republic, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Republic of Cameroon, the Republic of Congo, the Republic of Equatorial Guinea, and the Republic of Gabon – have entered into a collaborative partnership to establish the Central African Forest Initiative (CAFI). The objective of this initiative is to recognize and preserve the value of the forests in the region to mitigate climate change, reduce poverty, and contribute to sustainable development.

CAFI’s objectives are laid out in the CAFI Declaration: “to recognize and preserve the value of the forests in the region to mitigating climate change, reducing poverty, and contributing to sustainable development.”

These objectives will be attained through the implementation of country-led, national scale REDD+ and Low Emissions Development (LED) investment frameworks that include policy reforms and measures to address the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation and promote sustainable development.

The CAFI Fund Terms of Reference lay out CAFI’s Theory of Change.

As the midterm of the CAFI Fund approaches, it is time to take stock. As set out in the terms of reference of the CAFI Fund, “the Executive Board will commission two independent reviews/evaluations on the overall performance of the Fund. These evaluations will take place at mid-term and at the closure of the Fund (2022) respectively. The aim of these evaluations, to be spelled out in further detail in the TORs for the evaluations, will be to study the various performance. measurements of the Fund, to confirm or to annul them, and to test the theory of the change described in the Result Fund Matrix. The mid-term evaluation will consist of specific recommendations to the Executive Board for the review of the Fund Result Matrix and its underlying theories of the change if necessary.”

 

Duties and Responsibilities

For the full description of responsibilities, please review the Terms of Reference (TOR).

CLICK HERE to access the full TOR (20 pages).

Competencies

Competencies

  • Experience working with team
  • Attention to detail
  • Ability to manage workload with minimum supervision;
  • Ability to accommodate additional demands on short notice

Required Skills and Experience

Key selection criteria

  • Advanced university degree in international development, economics, finance, accounting or related areas (10 pts)
  • Minimum of 10 years in evaluation experience, including of large, regional or global funds and using a Theory of Change approach, and programme evaluation is an advantage (30 pts max)
  • Experience in assessing partnerships, and knowledge of results-based management orientation and practices (10 pts)
  • Knowledge of UN agencies (in particular FAO, UNDP, UN-Habitat, UNOPS, UNCDF), World Bank and bilateral cooperation agencies or banks (JICA, ENABEL, AFD) and any other organization listed here (10 pts)
  • Proven experience in developing countries (15 pts)
  • Experience with OECD- DAC evaluation principles (10 pts)
  • Excellent writing skills in English, reading and speaking skills in French, with analytic capacity and ability to synthesise project outputs and relevant findings for the preparation of quality project reports (15 pts)

 

Presentation of Offer

UNDP applies a fair and transparent selection process that would take into account both the technical qualification of Individual Consultants as well as their financial proposals. The contract will be awarded to the candidate whose offer:

  • is deemed technically responsive / compliant / acceptable (only technically responsive applications with a minimum score of 70 points/ candidates will be considered for the financial evaluation); and
  • has obtained the highest combined technical and financial scores

The application submission is a two-step process. Failure to comply with the submission process may result in disqualification of the application:

Step 1:  Interested individual consultants must apply online and include the following documents when

submitting the application in the UNDP job shop (enter hyperlink).

  • Personal History Form (P11) or An updated curriculum vitae (CV)

Step 2: Submission of Financial Proposal

Technically qualified applicants will be instructed to submit their financial proposals using the UNDP IC Offeror’s letter template. Daily fee/rate must be expressed in US dollars. The offeror’s letter/financial proposal should be submitted separately by email to the panel/staff who will conclude the technical-financial evaluation. Please do not include or mention your fees during the application process.

A panel interview will also be conducted.