- Le PNUD dans le monde
Fermer
Le PNUD est présent dans 177 pays et territoires.
Voir ci-dessous pour en savoir plus sur le travail de l'organisation sur le terrain.- Afghanistan
- Afrique du sud
- Albanie
- Algérie
- Angola
- Arabie saoudite
- Argentine
- Arménie
- Azerbaïdjan
- Bahreïn
- Bangladesh
- Barbade
- Bélarus
- Bélize
- Bénin
- Bhoutan
- Bolivie
- Bosnie-Herzégovine
- Botswana
- Brésil
- Bulgarie
- Burkina Faso
- Burundi
- Cambodge
- Cameroun
- Cap-Vert
- Centrafrique (République centrafricaine)
- Chili
- Chine
- Chypre
- Colombie
- Comores
- Congo (République démocratique du)
- Congo (République du)
- Corée (République populaire démocratique de)
- Costa Rica
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Croatie
- Cuba
- Danemark (Bureau de liaison)
- Djibouti
- Egypte
- El Salvador
- Emirats arabes unis
- Equateur
- Erythrée
- Ethiopie
- Fidji
- Finlande (Bureau de liaison)
- Gabon
- Gambie
- Genève (Bureau de liaison)
- Géorgie
- Ghana
- Guatemala
- Guinée
- Guinée-Bissau
- Guinée équatoriale
- Guyane
- Haïti
- Honduras
- Ile Maurice et Seychelles
- Inde
- Indonésie
- Irak
- Iran (République islamique d')
- Jamaïque
- Japon (Bureau de liaison)
- Jordanie
- Kazakhstan
- Kenya
- Kirghizistan
- Kosovo (selon RCSNU 1244)
- Koweït
- Laos
- Lesotho
- Lettonie
- Liban
- Libéria
- Libye
- Lituanie
- L’Ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine
- Madagascar
- Malaisie
- Malawi
- Maldives
- Mali
- Maroc
- Mauritanie
- Mexique
- Moldova
- Mongolie
- Monténégro
- Mozambique
- Myanmar
- Namibie
- Népal
- Nicaragua
- Niger
- Nigéria
- Norvège (Bureau de liaison)
- Ouganda
- Ouzbékistan
- Pakistan
- Panama
- Papouasie-Nouvelle-Guinée
- Paraguay
- Pérou
- Philippines
- Pologne
- Programme palestinien
- République dominicaine
- Roumanie
- Russie (Fédération de)
- Rwanda
- Samoa
- São Tomé-et-Principe
- Sénégal
- Serbie
- Sierra Leone
- Somalie
- Soudan
- Soudan du Sud
- Sri Lanka
- Suède (Bureau de liaison)
- Suriname
- Swaziland
- Syrie (République arabe syrienne)
- Tadjikistan
- Tanzanie (République-Unie de)
- Tchad
- Thaïlande
- Timor-Leste
- Togo
- Trinité et Tobago
- Tunisie
- Turkménistan
- Turquie
- U.E. (Bureau de liaison)
- Ukraine
- Uruguay
- Venezuela (République bolivarienne du)
- Viet Nam
- Washington (Bureau de liaison)
- Yémen
- Zambie
- Zimbabwe
Présence régionale
Le travail du PNUD est administré à travers 5 bureaux régionaux - A propos du PNUD
- Publications
- Centre de presse
National Consultant cum Evaluator, Terminal Evaluation | |
Lieu : | Home-Based with travel to Putrajaya and Kuala Lumpur where required, MALAISIE |
Date limite de candidature : | 01-Dec-20 (Minuit New York, États-Unis) |
Type de contrat : | Individual Contract |
Niveau du poste : | National Consultant |
Langues requises : | Anglais |
Date de commencement : (date à laquelle le candidat sélectionné doit commencer) | 07-Dec-2020 |
Durée du contrat initial | Up to 30 working days |
Durée prévue de la mission : | 7 December 2020 – 31 March 2021 |
Le PNUD s’engage à recruter un personnel divers en termes de genre, de nationalité et de culture. Nous encourageons de même les personnes issues des minorités ethniques, des communautés autochtones ou handicapées à postuler. Toutes les candidatures seront traitées dans la plus stricte confidentialité. Le PNUD ne tolère pas l’exploitation et / ou les atteintes sexuelles, ni aucune forme de harcèlement, y compris le harcèlement sexuel, et / ou toutes formes de discrimination. Tous/tes les candidats/tes selectectionnes /ées devront ainsi se soumettre à de rigoureuses vérifications relatives aux références fournies ainsi qu’à leurs antécédents. |
Historique |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In accordance with 2016 UNDP Evaluation Policy, UNDP Country Office in Malaysia is commissioning a terminal evaluation upon completion of a UNDP-supported Government-financed project implementation under the Country Programme Action Plan (CPAP) 2016 – 2020. This terms of reference (TOR) sets out the expectations for a Terminal Evaluation (TE) of the project titled Implementing the National Sustainable Consumption and Production Blueprint through Government Green Procurement (SCP-GGP).
The details of the SCP-GGP project to be evaluated are as follows: Project Summary Table
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Devoirs et responsabilités |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OBJECTIVE & SCOPE The project was designed to provide incremental support that will lead to the full adoption and implementation of the National Sustainable Consumption and Production (SCP) Blueprint, particularly through SCP Pathway 1 Government Green Procurement (GGP); to achieve the 11th Malaysia Plan’s target of 20% of selected groups of products and services in government procurement to be green procurement by year 2020. The project has three main outputs namely:
These outputs will in turn contribute to the achievement of the 11th Malaysia Plan Strategic Thrust 4 Pursuing Green Growth for Sustainability and Resilience, and Country Programme Action Plan 2016 – 2020 between Government of Malaysia and UNDP – Outcome 2 Enhancing national resiliency to climate variability and change.
The TE will be conducted according to the guidance, rules and procedures established by UNDP as reflected in the UNDP Evaluation Guidelines.
The objectives of the evaluation are to assess the achievement of project results, and to draw lessons that can both improve the sustainability of benefits from this project, and aid in the overall enhancement of UNDP programming.
EVALUATION APPROACH AND METHOD An overall approach and method[1] (For additional information on methods, see the Handbook on Planning, Monitoring and Evaluating for Development Results, Chapter 7, pg. 163) for conducting project terminal evaluations of UNDP supported projects has developed over time. The evaluator is expected to frame the evaluation effort using the criteria of relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability, and impact, as defined and explained in the UNDP Evaluation Guidelines (http://web.undp.org/evaluation/guideline/) and UNDP Guidance for Conducting Terminal Evaluations of UNDP-supported, GEF-financed Projects. The National Consultant cum Evaluator is expected to prepare, amend, complete and submit a set of questions covering each of these criteria in consultation with UNDP Malaysia Country Office; as part of an evaluation inception report, and shall include it as an annex to the final report. The evaluation must provide evidence-based information that is credible, reliable and useful. The evaluator is expected to follow a participatory and consultative approach ensuring close engagement with government counterparts, in particular, Economic Planning Unit – the implementing partner, UNDP Country Office, project team, and key stakeholders. Interviews will be held with the following organizations and individuals at a minimum:
The evaluator will review all relevant sources of information, such as the project document, project reports – including Mid-Year Progress Report, Annual Progress Report, project budget revisions, project files, national policy and strategic documents, and any other materials that the evaluator considers useful for this evidence-based assessment. A list of documents that the project team will provide to the evaluator for review is included in Annex A of this Terms of Reference.
EVALUATION CRITERIA & RATINGS An assessment of project performance will be carried out, based against expectations set out in the Project Logical Framework/Results Framework in the Project Document (which is available at https://open.undp.org/projects/00094672), which provides performance and impact indicators for project implementation along with their corresponding means of verification. The evaluation will at a minimum cover the criteria of: relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and impact. Ratings must be provided on the following performance criteria. The completed table must be included in the evaluation executive summary. The obligatory rating scales are included in Annex B.
PROJECT FINANCE/ CO-FINANCE The Evaluation will assess the key financial aspects of the project, including the extent of co-financing planned and realized. Project cost and funding data will be required, including annual expenditures. Variances between planned and actual expenditures will need to be assessed and explained. Results from recent financial audits, as available, should be taken into consideration. The evaluator will receive assistance from the Country Office (CO) and Project Team to obtain financial data in order to complete the co-financing table below, which will be included in the terminal evaluation report.
MAINSTREAMING UNDP supported projects are key components in UNDP country programming, as well as regional and global programmes. The evaluation will assess the extent to which the project was successfully mainstreamed with other UNDP priorities, including poverty alleviation, improved governance, the prevention and recovery from natural disasters, and gender.
IMPACT The evaluator will assess the extent to which the project is achieving impacts or progressing towards the achievement of impacts. Key findings that should be brought out in the evaluations include whether the project has demonstrated: a) verifiable improvements in the implementation of the National Sustainable Consumption and Production Blueprint through government green procurement, and b) demonstrated progress towards these impact achievements.
Conclusions, recommendations & lessons The evaluation report must include a chapter providing a set of conclusions, recommendations and lessons.
IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS The principal responsibility for managing this evaluation resides with the UNDP Country Office (CO) in Malaysia. The UNDP CO will contract the evaluator and ensure the timely coordination of meeting arrangements within the country for the evaluator. The Project Team will be responsible for liaising with the Evaluator to set up stakeholder interviews, arrange meetings, coordinate with the Government etc.
EVALUATION TIMEFRAME The total duration of the evaluation will be 30 days according to the following plan:
EVALUATION DELIVERABLES The evaluation team is expected to deliver the following:
*When submitting the final evaluation report, the evaluator is required also to provide an 'audit trail', detailing how all received comments have (and have not) been addressed in the final evaluation report.
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compétences |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate competencies
Functional competencies
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualifications et expériences requises |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The National Consultant shall have prior experience in evaluating similar projects. Experience with UNDP-supported projects is an advantage. The evaluator selected should not have participated in the project preparation and/or implementation and should not have conflict of interest with project related activities. The evaluator must present the following qualifications:
Education:
Experience:
Language: Language required for this assignment is English and Malay.
EVALUATOR ETHICS Evaluation consultants will be held to the highest ethical standards and are required to sign a Code of Conduct (Annex C to be provided by UNDP) upon acceptance of the assignment. UNDP evaluations are conducted in accordance with the principles outlined in the UNEG 'Ethical Guidelines for Evaluations'
DOCUMENTS TO BE INCLUDED WHEN SUBMITTING THE PROPOSALS Interested individual applicants must submit the following documents/information to demonstrate their qualifications:
General terms & conditions to be downloaded:
Reimbursable Loan Agreement (RLA): A legal instrument between UNDP and a Company/institution, according to which, the latter makes available the services of an individual delivering time-bound and quantifiable outputs that are directly linked to payments
ANNEXES 1. Annex A: List of Documents to be received by the Evaluators, http://www.my.undp.org/content/dam/malaysia/docs/Procurement/Annex A List of Documents to be revieced by the Evaluators.pdf 2. Annex B: Rating Scales, http://www.my.undp.org/content/dam/malaysia/docs/Procurement/Annex%20B%20Rating%20Scales.pdf 3. Annex C: Evaluation Consultant Code of Conduct and Agreement Form http://www.my.undp.org/content/dam/malaysia/docs/Procurement/Annex C Evaluation Consultant Code of Conduct and Agreement Form.pdf 4. Annex D: Evaluation Report Outline, http://www.my.undp.org/content/dam/malaysia/docs/Procurement/Annex%20D%20Evaluation%20Report%20Outline.pdf 5. Annex E: Evaluation Report Clearance Form. http://www.my.undp.org/content/dam/malaysia/docs/Procurement/Annex%20E%20Evaluation%20Report%20Clearance%20Form.pdf
UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, aboriginal groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Si vous éprouvez des difficultés avec les candidatures en ligne, merci de contacter erecruit.helpdesk@undp.org